who decides if a writer posts their "worst" or their "best?" Define "worst" and "best" and who determines if they are good or bad? Anyone posting an article, is hoping all readers are interested in such information. That is really impossible with such a wide range of likes and dislikes here. Not everyone likes the same kind of things, be it literature or what have you.
If it is a subject you don't like, or written by someone you don't like, do you even read it or just ass fuck it like the shitty trolls, or do you give advice on the writing rules for a proper article?
In my opinion, even if you don't like the article, it can be well done and deserves credit, especially if it brings forth many comments and discussion. Also, if edit advice is followed I feel it deserves a second look.
From what I have seen here, K5 is more like a popularity contest. If the ass fuck shitty trolls like you, you have it made even if the article is written poorly. If they don't like you or the topic, your out on your ass no matter what you write.
There is a difference between excellent trolling and plain ass fucking and it seems that K5 has both.
K5 used to be an excellent site and I believe it still is. It seems to need a bit of tweaking to return to where it was and I firmly believe this is possible. Looking at the number of accounts, the queue should be full on a daily basis, but I think some get fed up with the negative overtones.
Oh well, that's life on the cyber highway.
[ Parent ]