"What probably happened is that whoever made the sign used that image."
I agree, that must be the case. The two images are radically different yet the signs are identical, including Bert. Therefore the photo itself was not doctored, the sign must really be that way. And that leads inexorably to your conclusion.
But here's the problem: That poster is in Bangladesh. In order for your theory to work, some Bangladeshi needed to do a Google search for Osama, find that image and print it onto a poster. But why would they use a Google image of Osama--don't they have their own pictures? Add to that the fact that the fake site took the picture down after WTC (presumably right after), so the poster would have to be at least a month old. And why didn't THEY notice Bert in there.
Something fishy is going on...
[ Parent ]