If I write software, I automatically have a copyright on it. I don't have to do anything to gain permission. If we wanted to tax copyrighted property, we'd need some way of tracking who owns what property. The most obvious conclusion is that you'd have to fill out some form. Set aside the issue of how many governent employees we would need to run such an operation, and consider for a moment a world where everytime you create something original, a book, a play, some software, you'd have to get someone to give it a serial number and pay your dues. I really don't think you've thought about this enough. If people create something, and don't want to pay the h3lldr0p IP tax, they are going to sit on it. Then you will certainly never benefit from it.
You may subscribe to this silly "evil corporation" world view, but I sense that at the end of the day, all you want is more free shit. People work long and hard to create intellectual property, and they don't need your or the governments permission to benefit from it. People should be and end in themselves, not a means to h3lldr0p's ends.
About the analogy: I was trying to expose a logical fallacy in your argument. If you base an argument solely on an analogy, you better be damn well sure your analogy fits, or your argument falls apart.
Blackmarkets: Sure, underground markets exist now, however there is something inherently dangerous in driving intellectual property underground with cigarettes and bathtub gin.
As for the rest of your arguments, there is nothing terribly new or exciting there. I've heard all these arguments before and they've never worked. If you really think corporations are evil, say so and prove it, otherwise, please, don't bother telling me how you'd really like to get a Playstation 2 just because "ideas can't be owned".
Real computer scientists don't use computers.
[ Parent ]