In that case, criticizing the government is kind of fascist. Would you suggest that they go _against_ the will of the people? Sometimes it is prudent to do so, but not always.
First off, I challenge your use of the word "fascist" in this context. IMHO, such usage cheapens the word. I am a citizen, without any power to enforce my will except my voice. Fascism, for me, implies a powerful entity who enforces their will without consideration for opposing views. In this context I don't think that public criticism of the government or marketplace can ever be "fascist." Fascism can only come from those who have power -- typically guns -- to back up their words.
I would say it would be fair to criticize texans for electing the school board, but not the school board itself, unless they verifiably went against public opinion and didn't have a good reason for it.
Well, for all we know they did go against public opinion. But be that as it may, sometimes the majority is right, and sometimes the majority is wrong. Merely because we are criticizing what may be a majority opinion does not immediately invalidate that criticism. To take an extreme example: Were the school board to decide to only take math books that held pi to be equal to 4, we would certainly be correct in criticising them for it.
Libertarianism is like communism: both look great on paper.
[ Parent ]