Reading comprehension skills? It's always cute when someone makes comments like that but clearly doesn't understand what they're talking about.
"Greenpeace is a political organization which consolidates power from smaller eco-terrorist and communist organizations..."
Okay, apparently you need a lesson in the English language. Here we go:
When you say that Greenpeace consolidates power from "smaller" eco-terrorist and communist organizations, that's very different from saying that it consolidates power from "small" or "relatively small" eco-terrorist and communist organizations. Why is this? Because in order to use a comparative word like "smaller," there has to be an express or implied comparison-- in this case, the eco-terrorist and communist organizations have to be smaller than something else. In this case, they're smaller than Greenpeace.
We're good so far, right?
Unfortunately for you and your wise comments, when you stack modifers like you did, the modifiers apply to both sides of the comparison. Observe:
Fido stole the bone from a smaller rabid dog.
Note how this means that Fido is also rabid. Commas help solve this problem, and I suggest you use them appropriately:
Fido stole the bone from a smaller, rabid dog.
So what you apparently meant to say was as follows:
"Greenpeace is a political organization which consolidates power from smaller, eco-terrorist and communist organizations..."
Which I also disagree with. Some members may also be active in communist or militant eco-terrorist organizations, but the ones I know are not (I know several). You're attempting to use a pretty sad rhetorical technique. If you have a problem with Greenpeace, address what it is that they do or what position they take that offends you, not their alleged ties to Commmunists. What you're doing makes as much sense as me claiming that "Republicans are racists." Yes, some Republicans are racist, and there may even be a fairly high correlation between voting Republican and holding racist beliefs, but that's a far cry from Republicans being racist.
Your history of Greenpeace and ELF is quite simply wrong, and not worth addressing.
And the war in Iraq could have had severe environmental consequences, and (it could be argued) is tied directly to our oil consumption as a nation (I have plenty of problems with this assertion myself, so I'm not the one to argue this point).
"One of the founders" (Patrick Moore) is also a spokesperson for an association representing the world's largest logging companies. Thanks, but I'm familiar with him and what he has to offer, and I'm aware that it's complete bunk. Nice try.
And... finally, read the briefs. It wasn't in the high seas, and was therefore not piracy. That's why the DOJ is prosecuting them using this odd piece of law.
[ Parent ]